Coordination gaps, undefined scope boundaries, and ambiguous notes become RFIs, change orders, and — eventually — questions about your standard of care. A pre-issue read finds them while they are still a quiet redline, not a claim with your name on it.
Request a pre-issue reviewOnce the set is issued, a missing detail or a discipline conflict comes back as an RFI, then a change order, then — if it goes badly — a design-defect argument under Spearin and Coghlin. The implied warranty of design adequacy is a high bar. The time to meet it is before the documents leave your office.
The same disciplined read a sharp contractor will give your set on bid day — delivered to you first, across eight dimensions of risk and biddability, so you fix it on your terms instead of answering for it later.
Voltage and load mismatches between schedules, fixtures that don't reconcile across plans, embeds missing before the pour — the interface conflicts that drive the RFI storm.
Dangling references, undefined types, and schedule-to-plan mismatches — the loose ends reviewers miss and bidders exploit.
"Diagrammatic," "coordinate in the field," "fit in available space" — boilerplate that reads as design intent but shifts responsibility onto the builder, and back onto you when it fails.
The specific gaps and ambiguities in your set most likely to convert into post-award change orders traced to the documents.
Whether the documents support the intended sequence, or set up conflicts that surface as delay and acceleration claims.
Where design-by-allowance and open unit prices signal scope that isn't yet resolved on the drawings.
Coordination and completeness gaps that stall the trades and generate prolonged-overhead claims downstream.
Whether the set, specifications, and front-end align — or leave seams that invite RFIs and disputes.
Nemesis is our proprietary analysis engine. It applies the discipline of an adversarial reviewer to your own set — consistently, and before anyone else sees it.
A deterministic takeoff reads every sheet for scale, dimensions, and geometry — surfacing unquantifiable scope and sheets marked NTS that a bidder will flag first.
The full set is read for coordination conflicts, scope-gap boundaries, dangling references, and risk-transfer language — every finding cited to the exact detail, sheet, or phrase.
Findings are scored against outcomes from 33 real Massachusetts projects. Only the material, non-obvious ones ship — a focused redline you can resolve before issue.
A quieter construction phase, a client who sees fewer surprises, and documents that hold up under scrutiny. We are not a competing designer — we are an independent read that makes your set stronger before anyone else sees it.
Have us review your next set